Picture credit goes to Obsquatch.  Not counting the owner, I'd say my two novels are in good company.

Do you have any pictures you need to share?

Also, if you've read one of the books, please leave a review on the lulu page!

Okay, this was supposed to be a blog about something else, but I got into a discussion about target audiences with a friend and I wanted to open the discussion up a little.

First, the backstory is that one of the writing projects I'm working on is called "Destructive Criticism" and is a book that I'm writing in what will read as a rather unique, fast-pace narrative.  The other reason for the particular style is that I intend to post much of it right here, long before I ever actually publish it.

More importantly, however, this book--as I've mentioned before--is about two brothers who are about to hit it big with their respective internet shows.

So it'll be a unique story told in a unique way, essentially for the targetted audience of YOU.  And the other people in my YouTube community.

The question arises, however: am I handicapping myself by specifically targetting such a niche market?  Is it better to try and be more "mainstream"?

I look at everything else I've published and scratch my head.  It ranges from scriptbooks to a text-based thriller novel.  Mainstream my ass.  The most mainstream of my books is a short novel about paranormal investigators taking on vampires holed up in a library.

I didn't say it was mainstream, I said it was the MOST mainstream of my books.

Krumbine, it seems, is not much of a mainstream writer.

But maybe that's one of my problems?  I keep talking about needing to sell one more book to receive my first remission's check--would I have sold that book already if my material was more mainstream?

What do you think?